Fb User Busted Promoting Stolen U.S. Military Weapons, FBI Says
Www.oeisdigitalinvestigator.com:
A Fb user was promoting stolen US Military equipment, steadily from a wide stash of laser sights, in spite of Meta’s ban on the gross sales of such items on its platforms.
getty
In 2020, faded U.S. Military officer Bryan Allen admitted to stealing an estimated $2 million in navy equipment from his battalion at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. The stolen property integrated a big selection of weaponry, from grenades and smoke bombs to high-powered lasers and firearms scopes. A lot of the loot was below no circumstances recovered, in accordance to court docket data reviewed by Forbes. Allen acknowledged he had sold all of it.
“The defendant’s crime was terribly severe,” Justice Department prosecutors acknowledged at the time. “He risked national safety and in vogue public safety for his greed.”
About a years later, a confidential FBI informant urged the agency he’d talked about looking out to search out a laser note from a contact on Fb for $3,250, in accordance to a search warrant and a felony complaint filed final week. Further investigation realized that the owner of that Fb legend was Santa Ana, California resident Arthit Tanjapatkul, who’d got better than 260 items stolen by Allen and was promoting them on-line, steadily the expend of Fb via its Messenger app, the FBI claimed.
It’s unclear how Allen and Tanjapatkul grew to alter into acquainted, but PayPal data confirmed the suspect made approximately 150 payments to Allen totaling around $277,000, between July 2015 and April 2019, investigators acknowledged. Per the quest warrant, Allen failed to recall Tanjapatkul’s title, but did take into legend promoting the weapons to a person in California, right via an interview with investigators at his dwelling in February this yr.
“The government searched a storage unit utilized by Tanjapatkul and realized approximately 192 extra devices allegedly stolen by Allen ‘and a wide volume of suspected limited one sexual abuse materials.’”
While Meta has clamped down on weapons gross sales all over its websites, sellers proceed to make expend of its platforms to promote and sell guns and gun substances. Forbes not too prolonged within the past reported on a DOJ investigation into shootings of younger folks in El Cajon, California, in 2022, the keep the shooters allegedly sold their guns from a person promoting weapons on Instagram. Final yr, Forbesrealized just a few examples of gross sales of Glock switches, designed to flip pistols into automatic weapons, all over Fb, Instagram, Telegram and Twitter.
Meta declined to touch upon the document, but pointed Forbes to its policies that restrict customers from looking out to search out or promoting firearms and their substances, to boot to “deadly enhancements” on its platforms. It furthermore acknowledged that it scrutinized all requests for user facts to make certain that the govtwas both requesting facts pertinent to an investigation and conserving requests as narrow as conceivable to impress fewer folks.
As section of its investigation, the FBI seized facts from the alleged perpetrator’s Fb legend and realized a range of alternative discussions between Tanjapatkul and doable merchants of diverse “law enforcement and navy equipment,” in accordance to the warrant.
While Tanjapatkul’s bartering with merchants steadily began on Fb Messenger sooner than transferring to textual drawl, the suspect furthermore posted publicly about transactions on his Fb profile, the DOJ acknowledged. “Got plenty of my kit out to adoption as of late,” learn a put up on the nonetheless-active Fb legend in September final yr. “All of those FRENZ and Without a close in sight [sic] properties please wait and see whereas I kind out the total monitoring and transport.”
A search of Tanjapatkul’s property in October 2023 uncovered not much less than 71 items believed to have been stolen by Allen, including “aiming lasers, weapon lights, weapon sights, thermal sights, evening imaginative and prescient and other accessories,” the FBI acknowledged. Investigators furthermore acknowledged they’d realized dozens of firearms, including four machine guns. Per the felony complaint against him, the govtsearched a storage unit utilized by Tanjapatkul and realized approximately 192 extra devices allegedly stolen by Allen “and a wide volume of suspected limited one sexual abuse materials.”
Per the complaint against him, Tanjapatkul has not been charged for possessing CSAM, true for illegal possession of a machine gun. His lawyer failed to respond to a search facts from for comment. The Department of Justice urged Forbes Tanjapatkul is within the intervening time below dwelling detention and declined extra comment. It’s unclear if the DOJ has managed to secure better any of the opposite items pilfered and sold on by Allen.
Allen, who was sentenced to true over two years in July 2020, is now out of penal advanced.
Examine the forefront of digital research in our Latest News & Blog. Study expert analyses, technological advancements, and key industry insights that keep you informed and prepared in the ever-evolving world of digital forensics.
May per chance presumably the age of the particular prosecutor be nearing its pause?
In a potentially some distance-reaching ruling on Monday, a federal resolve in Florida brushed off a prison case in the hunt for to prosecute used President Donald Trump over his alleged retention of labeled documents.
Private investigator near me: Why We Wrote This
A federal resolve in Florida has brushed off the Trump documents case, asserting the particular counsel leading the prosecution has no constitutional energy to achieve so. The place does that push back fair investigations of presidents?
The decision by Aileen Cannon, a U.S. District Court docket resolve in Florida whom Mr. Trump appointed, held that the appointment of a uncommon prosecutor to the case by the U.S. Division of Justice was once unconstitutional. The particular counsel, Jack Smith, acknowledged he’ll charm the ruling.
The ruling represents basically the most modern in a string of correct victories for Mr. Trump. It comes days after he survived an assassination strive in Pennsylvania and hours sooner than he officially grew to vary into the Republican nominee for president. The used president is the subject of 4 separate prison prosecutions this yr; this is the third to maintain stalled in most modern months.
Include Cannon’s ruling nearly guarantees that the labeled documents case won’t chase to trial sooner than the presidential election. However as particular prosecutors maintain advance to be relied on in basically the most politically sensitive and weighty cases, the choice can maintain broader implications for presidential energyand the guideline of law.
May per chance presumably the age of the particular prosecutor be nearing its pause?
In a potentially some distance-reaching ruling on Monday, a federal resolve in Florida brushed off a prison case in the hunt for to prosecute used President Donald Trump over his alleged retention of labeled documents.
The decision by Aileen Cannon, a U.S. District Court docket resolve in southern Florida whom Mr. Trump appointed in 2020, held that the appointment of a uncommon prosecutor to the case by the U.S. Division of Justice was once unconstitutional. The particular counsel, Jack Smith, acknowledged he’ll charm the ruling.
Private investigator near me: Why We Wrote This
A federal resolve in Florida has brushed off the Trump documents case, asserting the particular counsel leading the prosecution has no constitutional energy to achieve so. The place does that push back fair investigations of presidents?
The ruling represents basically the most modern in a string of correct victories for Mr. Trump. It came days after he survived an assassination strive in Pennsylvania and hours sooner than he officially grew to vary into the Republican nominee for president. The used president is the subject of 4 separate prison prosecutions this yr; this is the third to maintain stalled in most modern months.
Within the short term, Include Cannon’s ruling nearly guarantees that the labeled documents case won’t chase to trial sooner than the presidential election in November. However as particular prosecutors maintain advance to be relied on in basically the most politically sensitive and weighty cases, the choice can maintain broader implications for presidential energyand the guideline of law.
What precisely took place on Monday?
The ruling came in a case connected to allegations that Mr. Trump retained labeled documents after leaving role of enterprise and refused to return them to federal authorities. (The case stems from that irascible raid of his Mar-a-Lago dwelling two years ago.)
Mr. Trump has pleaded not guilty to 40 prison counts in the case, but the choice this week had nothing to achieve with the allegations in the federal indictment. It concerned the particular individual that brought the indictment.
In explain to preserve some distance from an appearance of bias, Legal skilled Celebrated Merrick Garland assigned the case to Mr. Smith, a used Division of Justice prosecutor with journey investigating battle crimes and political corruption. This appointment, Mr. Trump’s legal professionals argue, was once unconstitutional.
Mr. Smith, who is additionally leading the case against Mr. Trump connected to his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, has countered that because he is an “tainted officer” below the Structure, he’ll also be appointed directly by the governmentdivision. Right here is real as a U.S. lawyer, who is arena to affirmation by the U.S. Senate, can unilaterally appoint an assistant U.S. lawyer.
In a 93-page decision, Include Cannon disagreed. Attributable to Congress didn’t maintain acceptable enter into Mr. Smith’s appointment, she ruled, it violated each and every the Appointments Clause and, as it pertains to spending, the Appropriations Clause of the Structure.
The Appointments Clause “offers Congress a thought to be feature in figuring out the propriety of vesting appointment energy for tainted officers,” she wrote. “The Special Counsel’s role successfully usurps that important legislative authority.”
Federal guidelines and guidelines maintain for decades held that particular prosecutors wants to be appointed in cases in which the impartiality of Justice Division officers could presumably very well be moderately puzzled, in particular for investigations into the president or a member of his Cupboard. Critics maintain hit lend a hand that these workplaces raise too mighty energy with too minute accountability, but courts maintain most regularly rejected constitutional challenges to a uncommon prosecutor’s appointment. Most lately, a federal resolve in Delaware rejected a deliver from Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son, that the particular prosecutor investigating him for federal gun crimes was once appointed on unconstitutional grounds.
U.S. Justice Division/Reuters
Documents and supplies seized during a search of used President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago dwelling and social membership are pictured on this undated handout list obtained by Reuters on June 25, 2024.
However Mr. Smith’s appointment was once varied, wrote Include Cannon.
“There does seem like a ‘tradition’ of appointing particular-lawyer-admire figures in moments of political scandal during the nation’s historical past,” she wrote. “However fully about a, if any, of those figures really resemble the role of Special Counsel Smith.”
As an illustration David Weiss, the particular prosecutor in the Hunter Biden case, was once serving as a U.S. lawyer when he took on the Biden case. Mr. Smith, meanwhile, was once working for a prison court docket at The Hague, Netherlands, when he took on the cases against Mr. Trump.
“The appointment of non-public voters admire Mr. Smith – rather then already-retained federal staff – looks mighty closer to the exception than the guideline,” acknowledged Include Cannon.
The governmentdivision’s “rising comfort” in appointing particular counsels “in the more most modern period,” she added, “has followed an ad hoc pattern with minute judicial scrutiny.”
How has the particular prosecutor feature modified?
Federal particular prosecutors had been historical for the reason that boring nineteenth century – President Ulysses Grant appointed John Henderson to analyze the Whisky Ring scandal – but they maintain got change into increasingly more overall since Watergate pressured the resignation of President Richard Nixon.
Mr. Nixon’s makes an try to fireplace the fair counsel investigating the Watergate scandal led Congress to chase a law outlining how and when particular prosecutors will also be historical. The statute underpinned particular prosecutions admire the Iran-Contra affair and the Whitewater scandal, to call two excessive-profile cases. However it came in for criticism from members of every and every political parties for enabling sprawling and unaccountable investigations at colossal model to the taxpayer.
Congress allowed that statute to hasten out in 1999, at which level the Justice Division utilized guidelines governing the employ of particular prosecutors. The guidelines require the lawyer overall to approve any action a uncommon prosecutor takes, but the lawyer overall have to file to Congress when he blocks a uncommon prosecutor action.
“That was once the compromise,” says Barbara McQuade, a used U.S. lawyer who teaches at the College of Michigan Regulations College.
The guidelines had been “an effort to preserve some independence, but address the concerns of the sprawling, ‘you’ve created a monster’ diagram of an fair counsel,” she provides.
Special prosecutors maintain since change into scheme more overall. Whereas there had been roughly 20 particular prosecutions in twenty years below the federal statute, there had been 5 in the final seven years. Some experts sing the guidelines had been helpful in allowing the federal executive to faithfully investigate cases the White House could presumably merely not maintain important pursued, similar to investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election, Jan. 6, and President Biden’s alleged unlawful retention of labeled documents.
Special prosecutors “had been historical [when] there’s in particular important, salient, politically charged investigations,” says Anthony Michael Kreis, a professor at the Georgia Instruct College College of Regulations.
“It’s been a terribly important tool in explain to destroy obvious that the Division of Justice’s work is accomplished in an attractive and fair scheme, with out any undue affect from the lawyer overall,” he provides.
On this list from video supplied by the U.S. Senate, Aileen Cannon speaks remotely during a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight nomination listening to July 29, 2020, in Washington. On Monday, Include Cannon brushed off the documents case against used President Donald Trump.
So what occurs now? What could presumably per chance this all mean?
Mr. Smith has appealed Include Cannon’s ruling to the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. The appeals court docket has already overruled the resolve once in the labeled documents case, but this query could presumably merely not chase the same scheme.
Judicial skepticism of particular prosecutors dates lend a hand to no lower than the 1980s. In a 1988 dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia criticized the U.S. Supreme Court docket for preserving that the fair counsel is an “tainted officer” and thus not in violation of the Appointments Clause.
Earlier this month, in a choice preserving that Mr. Trump has a level of presidential immunity from prison prices brought in the Jan. 6 case, Justice Clarence Thomas echoed those concerns in a concurring thought.
“I’m not obvious that any role of enterprise for the Special Counsel has been ‘established by Regulations,’ because the Structure requires,” he wrote. Decrease courts, he added, have to “resolution these a have to-maintain questions referring to [Mr. Smith’s] appointment.”
Include Cannon’s decision on Monday quoted the Justice Scalia dissent and the Justice Thomas concurrence. Neither of those opinions is binding law – genuinely, no varied justice joined both thought – but courts could presumably merely now be pushed in opposition to issuing a concrete ruling on the query.
If the feature of particular prosecutor is curbed, or abolished fully, the ideal response would be for traditional Justice Division prosecutors themselves to dangle on those politically sensitive cases. However that could presumably per chance merely be a sure thing for the nation, experts sing.
The existence of particular prosecutors inherently means that the Justice Division and its prosecutors are biased, provides Professor McQuade.
“We’ve to have confidence them to achieve their jobs successfully, [that] there are tests in the system,” she says.
However there does maintain to be a scheme to preserve presidents to fable if or after they rupture the law, experts sing, especially in the context of Congress being deeply polarized and the Supreme Court docket granting used presidents valuable immunity from prison prosecution, says William Howell, director of the Center for Effective Authorities at the College of Chicago.
“If there’s no particular prosecutor, and the president is granted in vogue immunity for any professional conduct, and Congress is congenitally incapable of mustering the supermajorities required to impeach [and] convict, what’s left?” asks Dr. Howell.
“That’s precisely the query we wants to be asking,” he provides. “There are in vogue concerns about the health and well-being of democracy, and the potentialities of preserving a president to fable are real turning into dimmer and dimmer.”
WALDORF, MD, September 26, 2024 /24-7PressRelease/ — S. Raschid Muller, PhD, has been selected for inclusion in Marquis Who’s Who. As in all Marquis Who’s Who biographical volumes, contributors profiled are selected on the basis of present reference value. Factors such as location, mighty accomplishments, visibility, and prominence in a self-discipline are all taken into fable at some level of the different job.
Dr. Muller is a notorious expert in cybersecurity and alerts intelligence, for the time being serving as the Director of Cybersecurity Operations at the U.S. Department of the Interior (DoI). On this role, he oversees cyber probability intelligence, collecting and inspecting recordsdata to name and mitigate ability threats. His responsibilities moreover encompass the exercise of evolved tactics to music and music malicious actions that pose risks to national safety, acquiring merchandise and applied sciences with noteworthy cybersecurity measures, and ensuring the safety and integrity of obtained resources.
Forward of his present location, Dr. Muller was an adjunct professor at the National Intelligence University in Bethesda, Maryland, from 2023 to 2024 whereas at the same time as serving as the Chief of Cyber Policy and Strategy Integration at the National Security Company (NSA) from 2021 to 2024. In 2021, he was a program supervisor for the Fourth Estate at the Protection Info Programs Company (DISA). He contributed his skills to the U. S. House Committee on Discipline of delivery Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection and Innovation (CIPI) subcommittee within the US Congress at some level of the 2020 federal election.
Furthermore, Dr. Muller was a college chair and professor at the College of Info and Our on-line world at the National Protection University from 2017 to 2019. His broad occupation in techniques engineering began at the Protection Info Programs Company (DISA) in Castle George G. Meade, Maryland, where he worked from 2007 to 2017.
Dr. Muller’s military carrier is equally commendable, having served within the US Navy in Special War Community 1 stationed between Marine Corp Air Discipline Miramar and Naval Amphibious Scandalous Coronado. His tutorial achievements are moreover broad, including a Doctorate in Industry Administration that specialize in Supply Chain Administration from Capitol Technology University in 2023, a Doctorate in Cybersecurity leadership from Capitol Technology University in 2021, and a PhD in Info Technology that specialize in Cybersecurity and Info Assurance from Capella University in 2019. He’s for the time being pursuing a master’s degree at the U.S. Naval War College, that will seemingly be his fifth master’s degree upon completion in 2025.
Extra underscoring his skills, Dr. Muller holds a huge quantity of certifications, including several CompTIA certificates within the self-discipline of Info Security. He’s a Licensed Info Privacy Alternatives Engineer (CDPSE), a Licensed Info Programs Auditor (CISA), a Licensed Info Security Supervisor (CISM), a Licensed Governance of Carrying out Info Technology (CGEIT) practitioner, a Licensed Ethical Hacker (C|EH), a Carrying out Administration Reputable (PMP), and a Chief Info Officer (CIO) program certificate graduate from the National Protection University at Ft. McNair in Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.
Dr. Muller’s respectable affiliations encompass memberships with the Info Programs Audit and Administration Association (ISACA), The Worldwide Council of Electronic Commerce Consultants (EC-Council), the American Council for Technology and Industry Advisory Council (ACT-IAC), the Department of Protection Acquisition Corps and the NAACP. He’s moreover enthusiastic with the National Unlit MBA Association, the National Protection Industrial Association (NDIA), and the Carrying out Administration Institute (PMI) Inc.
To boot as to his respectable accomplishments, Dr. Muller has made important contributions through his publications. He’s the creator of “How Historically Unlit Colleges and Universities and Historically Women individuals’s Colleges Can Wait on with Ability Shortages in Cybersecurity,” “An In-Depth Qualitative Interview: The Influence of Man made Intelligence on Consent and Transparency,” and “The Managerial Ethical and Operational Challenges of Sanatorium Cybersecurity,” all printed by IGI Worldwide.
In recognition of his broad occupation, Dr. Muller has been named a LEGIS Congressional Fellow by The Brookings Institution in 2020, a 2021 Executive Management Academy Fellow at the University of California – Berkeley’s Goldman College of Public Policy and has been inducted into The Worldwide Council of Electronic Commerce Consultants (EC-Council)’ Licensed Ethical Hacker Hall of Reputation in 2021. His dedication extends previous his respectable existence into civic engagement as a volunteer interior his local community. He’s a existence member of the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Integrated, and a Silver Existence member of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloration Of us (NAACP).
Dr. Muller enjoys spending time with his family and youth outside his respectable existence. He attributes his respectable success to his unwavering faith, choice, and fervour for reaching his dreams despite a huge quantity of obstacles and challenges along the formula. Having a gaze ahead, he plans to prioritize his family and arrive his executive occupation sooner than at closing retiring to skills a mute existence by the sea fling, where he can interact in actions be pleased fishing and leisure.
About Marquis Who’s Who®:
Since 1899, when A. N. Marquis printed the First Version of Who’s Who in America®, Marquis Who’s Who® has chronicled the lives of one of the most performed contributors and innovators from every important self-discipline of endeavor, including politics, commerce, remedy, law, education, paintings, faith and leisure. Who’s Who in America® stays a extraordinarily necessary biographical provide for thousands of researchers, journalists, librarians and executive search companies spherical the area. The suite of Marquis® publications also will doubtless be considered at the respectable Marquis Who’s Who® internet arrangement, www.marquiswhoswho.com.
Institutional interest in Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETFs has surged, marking a significant shift in the sentiment from mainstream finance
Major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and UBS have announced investments in BTC ETFs, signaling mainstream adoption.
The move represents a sea change from these outfits’ previous opinion of Bitcoin
In a groundbreaking week for the cryptocurrency market, a surge of institutional interest has been directed towards Bitcoin and Bitcoin Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). Bitcoin is no longer the domain of tech-savvy retail investors and early adopters, but has officially entered mainstream finance, with many institutions showing it the same respect they give gold and other hedges against inflation. It’s taken 15 years to get there, but Bitcoin has finally arrived.
OEIS Financial Fraud Private Investigator: Banks and Financial Institutions Take a Bit of Bitcoin
This week, major banks and even pension plans announced their investments in Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETFs, signaling an interesting shift in the financial landscape. The list of who has jumped on the Bitcoin bandwagon contains some household names.
JPMorgan Chase
JPMorgan Chase, one of the world’s largest and most influential banks, recently announced a more than $700,000 investment in Bitcoin ETFs.
This move is particularly noteworthy given the bank’s previous skepticism towards cryptocurrencies. JPMorgan’s entry into the BTC ETF market strongly envies Bitcoin’s viability as an investment asset.
Wells Fargo
Following closely behind, Wells Fargo also revealed its purchase of BTC ETFs. The bank’s $141,000 investment in Grayscale’s GBTC shows a growing interest and confidence in the cryptocurrency, even though their allocation has been small thus far.
UBS
It’s not just American institutions that are jumping on the BTC bandwagon. Swiss banking giant UBS also announced its investments in several BTC ETFs through Blackrock’s iShares, proving that this trend is not limited to one country or region.
The Bank of Montreal revealed its Bitcoin holdings through a recent 13F filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission in which it reported purchases of several Bitcoin ETFs, including those offered by Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, IBIT, and Grayscale.
OEIS Financial Fraud Private Investigator: Pension Plans Seeing the Potential of Bitcoin ETFs
The most impressive move lately has come from the Wisconsin State Investment Board. It became the first US state to allocate a significant portion of its pension fund to BTC ETFs, investing approximately $161 million. This decision is a mammoth step towards the mainstream adoption of BTC as an investment asset.
This is a big deal because pension plans have relied on stocks and bonds exclusively since their inception.
OEIS Financial Fraud Private Investigator: Why Is All of This Happening Now?
One of the primary reasons for this wave of institutional investment is the desire to diversify portfolios. With traditional markets experiencing volatility and low yields, Bitcoin offers an attractive alternative with its potential for high returns and low correlation with other asset classes.
Investing in BTC ETFs allows these institutions to tap into the growing market for Bitcoin without directly holding or managing the cryptocurrency themselves. This approach provides a level of security and regulatory compliance that is lacking in the traditional cryptocurrency market.
As central banks continue to print money, concerns about inflation are rising. Bitcoin is often viewed as a hedge against inflation, which is why gold and BTC see price bumps in periods of inflationary uncertainty.
With major global banks like JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo now invested in spot bitcoin ETFs, it is likely that more financial institutions will follow suit. This could lead to increased demand for BTC ETFs and potentially drive up the price of Bitcoin.
Furthermore, adopting Bitcoin ETFs by traditional financial institutions could also pave the way for regulatory approval of other cryptocurrency products. This could open up new investment opportunities for both institutional and retail investors.
So, while this week’s news is promising, you can bet that these financial institutions are going to closely monitor the cryptocurrency market and consider incorporating BTC ETFs into their investment strategies. As we saw with Bitcoin’s drop from $73,000 to $57,000, however, they are not averse to bailing out at the first sign of trouble, which could be why some of them are starting with relatively small sums of cash.
Overall, however, the move from these banking giants and pension providers is great news for Bitcoin’s aim to be taken seriously as a legitimate asset class.
