Diddy Seen Physically Assaulting Cassie In 2016 Surveillance Video
Www.oeisdigitalinvestigator.com:
Trigger warning: The footage shared includes images of domestic violence and abuse.
New video footage has surfaced of Sean “Diddy” Combs physically assaulting Cassie Ventura years ago.
CNNhas obtained and shared a surveillance video from March 5, 2016, of the mogul hitting his then-girlfriend repeatedly. The clip begins with Cassie carrying a bag down the hallway of the now-closed InterContinental Hotel in Century City, Los Angeles, and heading to the elevators. Combs catches up to her, grabs her by the back of the neck, and throws her to the floor. He turns around and kicks Ventura again as she lies motionless.
The video corroborates the “Me & U” singer’s claims made in her bombshell November 2023 lawsuit, where she accused the Bad Boy founder of rape, physical and mental abuse, sexual battery, sexual assault, and more.
As the disturbing video continues, Diddy drags Cassie from in front of the elevators and into the hallway. It then shows a clip of Diddy grabbing a glass vase and throwing it at Cassie, an event that was detailed in the November lawsuit.
Cassie’s lawyer Douglas Wigdor has shared a statement about the new video. “The gut-wrenching video has only further confirmed the disturbing and predatory behavior of Mr. Combs. Words cannot express the courage and fortitude that Ms. Ventura has shown in coming forward to bring this to light,” reads the statement, according to legal reporter Meghann Cuniff.
The aforementioned lawsuit was settled one day after the civil case was filed. The statement said they had reached a deal “to their mutual satisfaction” that Friday evening, but no terms of the agreement were disclosed.
Cassie’s lawsuit started a domino effect of accusations and suits thrown Diddy’s way ever since. The producer is currently involved in a lawsuit accusing him of raping a then 17-year-old girl in 2003. On Friday (May 10), Jonathan D. Davis, the attorney representing Sean Combs, filed a request to dismiss the suit and claimed the legal doc was a “false and hideous claim” that was untimely filed.
“This stunt is intended to prominently showcase a baseless and time-barred claim, which was designed to cause the Combs Defendants unwanted publicity, embarrassment, and financial costs, so Plaintiff could extract an undeserved financial recovery from them,” Combs’ motion read.
Examine the forefront of digital research in our Latest News & Blog. Study expert analyses, technological advancements, and key industry insights that keep you informed and prepared in the ever-evolving world of digital forensics.
You don’t settle on a tranquil, harmonious household to spice up the next Steve Jobs or Frida Kahlo.
Young folks who grow up with oldsters who recurrently disagree — in a positive style — can change into extra ingenious adults, Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist on the Wharton Faculty of the College of Pennsylvania recently told the “What Now? with Trevor Noah” podcast.
By arguing, Grant would now not mean yelling and screaming. In its place, the postulate is to model productive discussions for your young folks, ones whereby every events have interaction in dialog, hear every diversified out and, ideally, reach a wholesome consensus.
Rising up in a household with productive stress can display young folks that arguments don’t necessarily uncover lasting battle, and would possibly end result in ingenious suggestions of fixing concerns, stated Grant.
“In its place of factual defaulting or deferring to whatever an authority figure tells you, you sign, ‘Successfully, there are two diversified authority figures … and they also don’t agree,” he stated in the midst of the podcast episode, which published on August 15. “[It can] end result in cognitive complexity, nonetheless it can also also end result in extra braveness thru hard the plot quo because there may be no longer factual one factual solution.”
OEIS Cheating Spouse Private Investigator: How positive disagreements can foster creativity
Positive disagreements support mold ingenious young folks in a pair of suggestions, research presentations.
One such spy requested adults of their early 30s to write “imaginative tales,” and chanced on the most ingenious entries correlated with their childhood publicity to parental battle. One other chanced on that the most modern architects and scientists skilled some quantities of friction within their families.
“If no person ever argues, that you’ll likely be unlikely to provide up extinct suggestions of doing things, let by myself are trying fresh ones,” Grant wrote. “Difference is the antidote to groupthink … there may be no greater time than childhood to be taught to dish it out — and rob it.”
Constructing creativity would now not want to sacrifice reasonably one’s sense of security: A 2009 spy observed 235 families and chanced on that young folks ages 5 to 7 felt extra emotionally stable as soon as they’d oldsters who argued constructively. When observed all all over again three years later, they showed increased empathy and had been friendlier in college.
“A factual debate is no longer a battle. Or no longer it is no longer always even a tug-of-battle, the place that you may additionally mosey your opponent to your facet when you happen to pull exhausting sufficient on the rope,” Grant wrote in his 2021 book, “Deem Again: The Power of Colorful What You Don’t Know.” “Or no longer it’s extra admire a dance that hasn’t been choreographed … Whenever you happen to can also adapt your strikes to hers, and uncover her to assemble the the same, that you’ll likely be extra seemingly to discontinue up in rhythm.”
Desire to master you money this plunge?Test in for CNBC’s fresh on-line course. We’ll dispute you shining suggestions to hack your finances, minimize your debt, and grow your wealth. Birth as we inform to with out a doubt feel extra confident and successful. Use code EARLYBIRD for an introductory good aquire of 30% off, now prolonged thru September 30, 2024, for the succor-to-college season.
A scorching potato: Security researchers play a in actuality indispensable feature in retaining the rating from cyber threats. They stumble on and expose vulnerabilities in serious programs to present protection to users and divulge establishments. So, it be no exiguous affair when a authorities entity takes real circulation in opposition to these watchdogs.
In a strange flip of events following a most crucial ransomware assault on the metropolis of Columbus, Ohio, a pick has issued a non everlasting restraining expose in opposition to cybersecurity researcher David Leroy Ross. The Dispatch notes that Ross allegedly published files in terms of a safety breach final month that he felt officials had been searching to brush below the rug.
The July 18 assault became attributed to the ransomware community Rhysida. It resulted within the theft of 6.5 terabytes of fine files hosted on Columbus metropolis servers. Rhysida tried to auction the files for $1.7 million in Bitcoin. Then all over again, failing to search out a buyer, the community released roughly forty five p.c of the files on the sad internet.
Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther within the starting up assured the public that the stolen files became either encrypted or corrupted, rendering it unusable. Then all over again, below the alias Connor Goodwolf, Ross challenged these claims by presenting evidence to local media that the files became intact and contained “highly fine” files. This files integrated non-public exiguous print of metropolis workers and residents, fine files from domestic violence conditions, and the Social Security numbers of law enforcement officials and crime victims.
In response to Ross’s disclosures, the metropolis of Columbus filed a lawsuit in opposition to him, alleging prison acts, invasion of privateness, negligence, and civil conversion. The lawsuit argues that by downloading and disseminating the files, Ross interacted with prison ingredients on the sad internet, requiring in actuality perfect abilities and tools. The metropolis moreover contends that his actions made the files extra publicly accessible, posing a most crucial possibility to public safety.
“The sad internet-posted files is no longer readily available for public consumption,” metropolis attorneys claimed. “[The] defendant is making it so.”
A Franklin County pick issued the restraining expose this week, prohibiting Ross from gaining access to, downloading, or disseminating any of the stolen files. The resolution became made “ex parte,” that approach it became issued without notifying Ross or allowing him to present his case.
Ars Technica notes that City Attorney Zach Klein defended the true circulation, stating that the lawsuit became critical to terminate the dissemination of stolen prison investigatory data and to present protection to public safety.
“Here is no longer about freedom of speech or whistleblowing,” he said. “Here is ready the downloading and disclosure of stolen prison investigatory data.”
Unsurprisingly, the restraining expose has sparked controversy. Ross accused the metropolis of attempting to scapegoat him for its safety disasters. He has indicated plans to secret agent real recourse, potentially titillating the American Civil Liberties Union. Meanwhile, the metropolis faces extra real challenges, as civil attorneys have filed no lower than two lawsuits searching for class-circulation area over the metropolis’s failure to present protection to non-public files.
Thomas has been below colossal scrutiny since experiences surfaced that the conservative justice had did no longer expose luxurious proceed prices and other forms of gifts from his rich chums, including smartly-known GOP donor Harlan Crow. Primary parts of Thomas’ benefits were first reported in April 2023 by ProPublica, which estimates that the gifts’ total price provides up to millions of bucks.
Democrats have pressed for expanded oversight of the Supreme Court in light of experiences on Thomas’ gifts. Democratic Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Ron Wyden sent a letter to U.S. Legal expert Frequent Merrick Garland in July within the hunt for an ethics investigation regarding Thomas. The lawmakers particularly requested Garland to investigate a $267,000 loan that the justice used to secure a luxurious motor coach in 1999, which used to be no longer reported by Thomas at the time.
McCabe broke down what it might perchance per chance perchance well well take for the federal executive to commence an ethics or monetary investigation of Thomas whereas talking with fine analyst Allison Gill on the pair’s weekly podcast, Jack, which follows the Division of Justice (DOJ) probes of mature President Donald Trump. McCabe illustrious in an episode launched Sunday that the FBI can commence a paunchy field investigation if “records that a federal crime has been dedicated or that a possibility to nationwide safety … might perchance per chance exist.”
“There’s no legislation or policy that prohibits DOJ from doing that,” McCabe continued. “Surely, they are tasked with investigating and prosecuting violations of federal legislation. This would perchance well well without whisper be that, and so it might perchance per chance perchance well well tumble smartly interior their authority to attain it. But it no doubt will likely be very, very, very controversial.”
Whitehouse and Wyden’s letter had particularly raised questions about capability tax violations that Thomas might perchance per chance well have dedicated in connection to the plush motor coach loan. Wyden’s office beforehand reported that Thomas by no method repaid the over quarter-of-a-million dollar loan, raising questions about whether the justice reported the loan’s obvious forgiveness on his tax returns, as required by legislation.
“The tax case is both fine and spoiled,” McCabe defined, noting that the IRS would have investigative jurisdiction over such accusations and that the office is “statutory in nature.”
“Ought to you will likely be doing a criminal investigation, and you like to must secure anyone’s tax records, it be very complex, at the same time as an FBI agent with a actually predicated investigation,” he added. “You do no longer lawful scoot to IRS and direct, ‘Hey, give me this dude’s records,’ enjoy you in most cases can attain with any other executive file. You absolutely must have an allege from a federal think requiring the IRS at hand it over.”
McCabe furthermore illustrious that Thomas’ capability failure to enjoy out a monetary disclosure accumulate with regards to the loan “would likely no longer give upward thrust to an articulable violation of federal criminal legislation except Congress passed the legislation requiring.”
He added that Whitehouse and Wyden’s letter to the DOJ used to be likely “performative or political in nature,” given the complexities of the accusations against Thomas. Apt specialists beforehand told Newsweekthat it used to be no longer going that Garland would conform to commence an investigation into the Supreme Court justice, although Fordham Legislation Faculty professor Bruce Green talked about that the Democrats “provide a solid case on the facts for opening a criminal investigation of Justice Thomas.”
Green told Newsweek that if Garland opened an investigation, “that might perchance per chance undermine public admire for the legitimacy of the Division of Justice. The Legal expert Frequent isn’t any longer going to possibility the legitimacy of his accumulate establishment to guard the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. He’ll leave it to Chief Justice Roberts and the assorted justices to preserve their rental in allege.”
Indiana College’s Maure Faculty of Legislation professor Charles Gardner Geyh furthermore told Newsweek closing month that the “region is complex by the incontrovertible truth that there are fine reasons to pursue an investigation that coincide with political ones.”
Newsweek reached out to the Supreme Court’s public records office by the explain of email for articulate on Monday.