Examine the forefront of digital research in our Latest News & Blog. Study expert analyses, technological advancements, and key industry insights that keep you informed and prepared in the ever-evolving world of digital forensics.
Www.oeisdigitalinvestigator.com:
Donald Trump addressing a crowd during a campaign rally at Smith Reynolds Airport on September 8, 2020 in Winston Salem, North Carolina. (Sean Rayford/Getty Images)
Donald Trump’s lawyers looked to pull the old switcheroo Monday when they requested a federal judge to reject the gag order in the classified documents case that was requested by special counsel Jack Smith – and instead find the prosecution in contempt.
Smith’s office last week requested Judge Aileen Cannon, who is overseeing the classified document case in Florida, to impose a gag order on Trump, limiting his ability to publicly discuss the law enforcement search of his Mar-a-Lago resort back in 2022. That came after the former president falsely claimed that the FBI had been authorized to kill him, a claim rebutted by the bureau itself.
On Memorial Day, the presumptive GOP nominee’s attorneys claimed that the gag order request was an “extraordinary, unprecedented, and unconstitutional censorship application,” meant to target Trump’s speech during his run for president, CNN reported. Vehemently contested is the special counsel’s suggestion that the gag order be added to Trump’s conditions of pre-trial release, meaning that a probation officer, not a judge, would decide whether the former president’s comments are a violation.
Trump is currently under a gag order in New York state court for his ongoing hush money trial and in Washington, DC for his election interference case.
In Florida, Trump’s defense attorneys argued that the special counsel “improperly” requested a gag order “based on vague and unsupported assertions about threats to law enforcement personnel.” Attorneys also referred to prosecutors as “self-appointed Thought Police,” and claimed they were “seeking to condition President Trump’s liberty on his compliance.”
Trump’s legal team implored the judge to not only reject the gag order but also impose sanctions on “all government attorneys who participated in the decision to file the Motion.”
Randall Eliason, a law professor at George Washington University and former federal prosecutor, suggested the defense arguments were without merit, posting on X: “I think this is the whiniest pleading I’ve ever read.”
Private investigator near me:
Updated [hour]:[minute] [AMPM] [timezone], [monthFull] [day], [year]
CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — Clinical advocacy teams hold welcomed Johnson & Johnson’s resolution no longer to put in force its patent on a excessive tuberculosis treatment, allowing its production at mighty decrease costs, after South African authorities opened an investigation into the conglomerate.
The South African Competition Charge in a press free up on July 5 said it made up our minds no longer to prosecute a complaint against J&J concerning “allegations of abuse of dominance,” which was prompted after J&J and its subsidiary filed a secondary patent for bedaquiline final one year, faded to deal with drug-resistant TB.
Experts argued that the patent averted generic producers from making more affordable medicines, threatening the medication of tens of hundreds of folks in South Africa. TB killed bigger than 50,000 folks there in 2021, making it the nation’s leading location off of loss of life.
Authorities said J&J has agreed no longer to put in force its patent and to fall the trace charged to South Africa by about 40%.
“We hope this sends a substantial message to pharma that they can’t continue their anti-competitiveness monopoly and prioritize income over folks’s lives,” said Candice Sehoma, an advocacy adviser at Doctors Without Borders in South Africa.
Sehoma told The Connected Press on Tuesday that she hoped generic producers in South Africa might presumably presumably be ready to commence producing bedaquiline within the impending years, including that Indian factories already accomplish the drug.
Closing one year, activists in countries including India, Belarus and Ukraine protested against efforts by J&J to shield its patent on bedaquiline, however had little response. J&J utilized to hold its South Africa patent extended until 2027, enraging activists who accused it of profiteering.
In an habitual wander no longer easy the influence of astronomical prescribed medications, the South African authorities then began investigating the corporate’s pricing insurance policies. The nation had been paying about 5,400 rand ($282) per medication route, a ways bigger than uncomfortable countries that got the drug by a world effort known as the Close TB Partnership.
Fatima Hassan, the founder of the activist community Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, pointed out that patenting options for other key medicines for ailments including HIV, cancer and cystic fibrosis could additionally be investigated by regulatory companies for his or her pricing insurance policies.
“Going forward, pharmaceutical companies ought to be held in test and to yarn,” Hassan said in a press free up.
The Connected Press Health and Science Department receives wait on from the Howard Hughes Clinical Institute’s Science and Academic Media Crew. The AP is entirely liable for all divulge.
Www.oeisdigitalinvestigator.com:
A former FBI employee who raised questions about the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol had his security clearance reinstated and was awarded 27 months of backpay after being suspended since February 2022, his lawyer told CNN.
FBI staff operations specialist Marcus Allen had his security clearance suspended in 2022 when the FBI cited security concerns related to his “allegiance to the United States” in a letter previously shared with Congress.
Allen testified at a congressional hearing led by House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan last year after the bureau informed Congress it had revoked the security clearances of three agents who either attended the riot at the US Capitol or espoused alternate theories about the Capitol attack.
When explaining its initial decision to revoke Allen’s security clearance to Congress, the FBI wrote that its investigation showed Allen had “questionable judgment, unreliability, and unwillingness to comply with rules and regulations,” indicating that he could not properly safeguard classified or sensitive information.
The FBI listed a variety of reasons for suspending Allen in their letter, including a September 29, 2021, email in which Allen called on FBI officials to exercise “extreme caution and discretion in pursuit of any investigative inquiries or leads pertaining to the events of” January 6, according to a copy of the letter.
Allen testified during last year’s congressional hearing that he “played no part in the events of Jan. 6,” but alleged that he was retaliated against “because I forwarded information to my superiors and others that questioned the official narrative of the events of Jan. 6.”
The bureau reinstated Allen’s security clearance on May 31 after reaching a settlement agreement, Allen’s lawyer, Tristan Leavitt, told CNN. Allen then resigned from the bureau on Monday.
“This is total vindication for Marcus,” Leavitt, president of Empower Oversight, said in a statement. “The FBI has completely backed down and provided everything that we had asked for on behalf of Marcus. It’s clear from the evidence and the FBI’s capitulation there was absolutely no truth to their accusations.”
In response to his security clearance being reinstated, Allen stated, “it’s been a difficult couple of years, and I am truly grateful for my friends and family who helped us through this.”
In a statement provided to CNN, the FBI defended how the process was handled.
“While we can’t comment on the specifics of any settlement, both parties agreed to resolve this matter without either admitting wrongdoing. Any allegation that the Director lied to Congress is false. The FBI takes seriously its responsibility to FBI employees who make protected disclosures under whistleblower regulations, and we are committed to ensuring they are protected from retaliation,” the FBI said.
Jordan, who has used cases like Allen’s to raise allegations of discrimination and bias within the FBI, pressed Attorney General Merrick Garland during a congressional hearing on Tuesday whether Allen had been wrongfully retaliated against.
“I don’t know anything about the facts of that case. Retaliating against whistleblowers is against the law and it will be punished,” Garland testified.
For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com
For expert assistance in safeguarding your digital world, trust OEIS, your professional digital private investigator. We are committed to providing you with the highest level of service and expertise. Contact us to learn more about how we can help protect your digital interests.
