Trinasolar introduced the case to the ITC in gradual October, alleging that Canadian Photo voltaic is infringing on its technology patents for tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) relate voltaic cells. Trina has petitioned the ITC to introduce a Tiny Exclusion Uncover to bar importation and Cease and Desist Orders to bar additional gross sales and marketing and marketing in the United States of relate voltaic cells, modules and parts that infringe its patents.
“Trina appreciates the ITC’s decision to investigate the unauthorised expend of our patented technology,” acknowledged Steven Zhu, president of Trinasolar US. “We’re happy our patent infringement criticism is being taken critically, and we stay up for the closing possibility by the ITC.”
Here’s the 2nd TOPCon patent criticism of Trina’s which the ITC has opted to investigate. Closing month it announced an investigation into mental property infringement allegations Trina introduced towards Chinese competitor Runergy and Indian conglomerate Adani Photo voltaic.
That case became filed on behalf of Trina’s US headquarters, its Chinese alternate and its US manufacturing facility in Texas. Since the submitting, Trina has sold its Texas relate voltaic module manufacturing plant to Norwegian battery manufacturing firm Freyr Battery. The sale coincided with Donald Trump’s presidential election victory after a marketing and marketing campaign where the now-president-elect promised a hardline approach to taxing Chinese corporations working or importing to the US. Daniel Barcelo, Freyr Battery CEO, denied to PV Tech Top rate that the sale had any relation to Trump’s victory.
The sale also raised some eyebrows all over the alternate as Freyr Battery had no previous trip of manufacturing relate voltaic merchandise. Trina retains a minority stake in the capability.
This week, Trinasolar has also raised a lawful criticism to the DOC over its investigation into alleged AD/CVD violations by largely Chinese relate voltaic producers working in four Southeast Asian worldwide locations.
In a letter to the secretary of commerce, Trina’s lawyers alleged the DOC had made a “important ministerial error” in its preliminary antidumping possibility for Trinasolar’s manufacturing amenities in Thailand.
A coalition of US-basically basically basically based producers launched the most up-to-the-minute relate voltaic AD/CVD case in April. It seeks to impose import tariffs on relate voltaic cells (whether or no longer inside of modules or no longer) shipped from Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam to the US. The complainants yell that these cells are being sold in the US at unfairly low costs and benefitting from unlawful subsidies which would possibly perhaps perhaps also be destructive the domestic alternate.
Trinasolar Thailand became awarded a preliminary dumping rate of 77.85%, one in all the bigger rates amongst corporations which complied with the court docket cases.
Its criticism to the DOC relates to the price of silicon wafers which the DOC utilized to Trinasolar. The firm contests that the DOC “made adjustments” to the costs that Trinasolar supplied the investigation, which increased the estimated impress of its wafers by between four and 5 times. The adjustments had been basically basically basically based on a hiss import code for silicon wafers.
Trinasolar says this inflated its total presumed manufacturing costs by 180%.
The DOC’s investigation depends on responses from hiss corporations (“important respondents”) which then make the belief of its wider findings for a particular person country. Companies who originate no longer adjust to the investigation are frequently given the top assumed rates.
In October, earlier than the preliminary antidumping rates had been released, two Cambodian producers printed letters informing the DOC that they would perhaps no longer cooperate with the investigation on tale of they lacked the resources to proceed participating.
Read more of our AD/CVD coverage right here.
