25-300 and sixty five days-Outdated California Man Charged With Killing His Dad After Body Realized in Dumpster
Private investigator near me:
A California man has been arrested after the physique of his father used to be stumbled on shot dreary in a Union City dumpster.
Hayward Police launched an investigation when the 58-year-broken-down father didn’t hide upt to work on Wednesday and used to be now now not answering his phone, KRON reported.
While officers didn’t accumulate the man, they did accumulate proof of what they believed used to be a lethal shooting.
On Thursday, the Oakland Police Department contacted their counterparts in Hayward and acknowledged that they had 25-year-broken-down David Sanchez in custody on an unrelated matter and requested a welfare check on his father “per statements Sanchez made all over their investigation,” the Hayward department acknowledged.
Hayward detectives took Sanchez into custody, and that’s when he told them his father’s physique used to be in a dumpster in Union City.
Examine the forefront of digital research in our Latest News & Blog. Study expert analyses, technological advancements, and key industry insights that keep you informed and prepared in the ever-evolving world of digital forensics.
I had always figured that cheating on my partner was sort of impossible since we opened our relationship. Before, when we were monogamous, the parameters of what was and was not cheating were incredibly clear: No sleeping with other people. Flirting (for us) fine, porn (for us) fine. But now we did the thing we didn’t used to do. In fact, not only did we sleep with other people, we developed long-term sexual and emotional connections with people too. And we told each other all about it.
We had worked hard together to make something flexible and something with more fun and more love at its heart than what we had landed on in our version of monogamy. Sex, before we went open, had in some ways become a site of tension. So it became a priority, a central tenet if you will, that we felt free to sexually express ourselves, to follow and explore our desires. So I’d never even thought about cheating because by definition, surely, it didn’t exist.
So how was it that we were here, in our bedroom after a Saturday night out clubbing, and my partner was looking at me with watery eyes and telling me he felt cheated on?
Well, because I sort of had cheated on him. And I’d sort of known I was doing it too. Not cheating, but a sexy betrayal, perhaps? I didn’t necessarily derive pleasure from that fact. Instead, and perhaps this is just as bad, I just didn’t think about him. I was having great sex with someone I was really into.
See, in our open relationship we have one rule: No sleeping with someone else in our bed. We tried it once at the very beginning. I smelled someone else’s cologne on my pillow (Creed Aventus, not chic), and suddenly the knowledge that someone who wasn’t me had lain in this bed rendered me really, surprisingly sad for weeks. And so we stopped doing that, my partner totally obliging without a second of resistance. Then four years passed. And many lovers. But never in our bed.
“This was your rule!” my partner rightly said after I told him about the guy I’d brought back to our place. Perhaps I’d told him way too casually, sort of off the cuff. In my defense—and as I reminded my partner—we had been talking recently about perhaps changing our bedroom rule. Be warned, those of you who are toying with openness: Finding a place to fuck is obstacle number two in all this; number one is working out schedules. It’s all just quite a lot of admin, really.
But here we were in the heart of the drama—much much more drama than when I’d told him, equally as casually, that I had feelings for someone else. My partner explained that just because we’d floated a change, I wasn’t free to act on it. He wasn’t actually mad or upset I’d slept with someone else or, ultimately, that it had been in our bed.
It seemed, as we got to the bottom of it, that what had upset him was that I had removed his agency over a choice that ultimately protects him and us both. In monogamy the protective choice is to not sleep with anyone else. Our one protection, our control rule, was about not sleeping with others in our bed. It was the outer perimeter of our trust; it had formed a small but necessary bedrock, an acknowledgment that in all this freedom, we keep one thing sacred. He told me he felt I’d prioritized my libido over his feelings. Which I had.
I told him I felt sorry. That I felt guilty, which didn’t really help. And I told him I understood, but I felt surprised that he had used the term cheating. Once the fight was over, I wondered what it was about this incident that made it cheating rather than, say, breaking a rule. And I think it’s actually the same across all relationships, monogamous, anarchic, open, whatever. Cheating is when we cheat people out of something—out of choice, agency, knowledge. We cheat people out of an opportunity to express their feelings or wants or needs about a situation or we cheat people out of the ability to try to remedy a situation. We cheat people out of feeling cared for and protected in the ways that both parties had mutually agreed upon.
In honesty, I knew my partner and I would be okay. I don’t wish for moral or ethical perfection from my partner, and he doesn’t wish it from me. In fact, in my experience of openness or non-monogamy, it’s the complicated situations that seem to herald the start of a growth period or a chance to reassess the boundaries. For us, our bedroom remains sacred—or perhaps it’s our agreement that’s sacred, whatever that may be.
The European Solar Manufacturing Council (ESMC) has voiced support for the inclusion of non-price criteria in auctions for solar modules, as laid out in the EU Net Zero Industry Act. The council’s recommendation paper also calls for member states to adopt the act as quickly as possible and highlights concern around cybersecurity and data security in relation to Chinese inverters.
The ESMChas published a recommendation paper on the implementation of the European Union’s Net Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which the European Parliament approvedin April.
The council said Europe’s solar energy dependency on one single country “makes us very vulnerable and jeopardizes both energy security and the whole green transition.” It added that the entire supply chain and manufacturing ecosystem for solar PV products “needs to be shored to Europe to the greatest extent possible.”
To strengthen the European sustainable solar supply chain, the EMSC’s paper proposes a carbon footprint mechanism to be used as an award or eligibility criteria, as well as an exclusion of countries with more than 50% of the market share from some public procurements and tenders and a ban on products from countries and regions with exposure to forced labor.
“With adequate criteria for resilience, sustainability and worker’s rights, auctions have the potential to serve as a crucial instrument in reshoring of solar manufacturing to Europe,” said ESMC’s Vincent Delporte, also head of public affairs at Holosolis. “We hope this paper can serve as a valuable resource for anyone interested in criteria for auctions of sustainably European made solar modules in accordance with the objectives of the NZIA.”
Popular content
The ESMC said the NZIA should be adopted “as fast as possible”, ahead of the deadline of October 2025 given by the European Commission, to give the industry “a more predictable future and vision, and increasing the chances of opportunities for businesses.” The council also calls for regular dialogue between manufacturers, policy makers and member states – in line with the agreement in the European Solar Charter – to ensure that regulation and investment move forward together.
Elsewhere in the paper, the ESMC recommended that PV modules be given unique barcodes, displayed either in whole EU or separate EU countries databases, and backs the implementation of a PV Passport. The council also says it foresees that “more work needs to be done on the issue of cyber and data security.”
Noting that around 80% of all new inverters currently installed in the EU are now made in China, the paper said that “the Chinese state, in a polarized situation, could force Chinese inverter manufacturers to provide the data about European PV systems.” It added that as a worst-case scenario, a conflict with China could see Chinese inverter manufacturers orchestrate blackouts in Europe, requiring a total restart of the entire power grid that could take up to a week.
ESMC said the problem could be mitigated by procuring European-made inverters instead. In August 2023, the council’s survey of 15 European PV manufacturers found that solar module production dropped from 9 GW to 1 GW in a year.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith‘s latest court filing “exposes the dangerous, incendiary, violence-inducing lies of Donald Trump,” legal analyst Glenn Kirschner said on Saturday.
On Tuesday, the former president posted misleading claims about the warrant’s wording on his Truth Social account, alleging that the DOJ “AUTHORIZED THE FBI TO USE DEADLY (LETHAL) FORCE.” In addition, a Trump campaign email that was recently sent to supporters claimed that FBI agents were “authorized to shoot” Trump, claiming President Joe Biden was “locked & loaded and ready to take me [Trump] out.”
“The FBI followed standard protocol in this search as we do for all search warrants, which includes a standard policy statement limiting the use of deadly force. No one ordered additional steps to be taken and there was no departure from the norm in this matter,” the agency’s statement said.
Discussing Trump’s claim about the search warrant, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said at a press conference on Thursday that the “allegation is false and it is extremely dangerous,” reiterating that the document in question is standard policy.
In a Saturday video on his YouTube channel, Kirschner, a former assistant U.S. attorney and frequent critic of the former president, said, “A fourth judge is now considering the need to gag Donald Trump to keep him from endangering the folks who are involved in the endeavor of trying to hold him accountable for his crimes.”
Newsweek has reached out to Kirschner and Trump’s spokesperson for comment via email on Sunday.
Special counsel Jack Smith is seen on August 1, 2023, in Washington, D.C. Smith’s latest court filing “exposes the dangerous, incendiary, violence-inducing lies of Donald Trump,” legal analyst Glenn Kirschner said on Saturday.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
In response to Trump’s assassination claims, Smith filed a motion on Friday for Judge Aileen Cannon to bar Trump from making “statements that pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger” to law enforcement agents involved in the case.
The motion says Trump’s inaccurate comments make “a grossly misleading impression about the intentions and conduct of federal law enforcement agents—falsely suggesting that they were complicit in a plot to assassinate him—and expose those agents, some of whom will be witnesses at trial, to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment.”
Kirschner said Smith’s latest filing “exposes the dangerous, incendiary, violence-inducing lies of Donald Trump.” He added that it “demands that the judge…do something about it.”
Cannon, who was appointed by Trump in 2020 and is overseeing the classified documents case, has faced criticism for making several decisions that some say have favored the former president. Earlier this month, Cannon indefinitely suspended the start of the trial while other legal disputes related to the case are being settled.
Several legal analysts support Smith’s filing, suggesting it will put Cannon in a difficult position. If she doesn’t grant the gag order, Smith could appeal to a higher court, citing potential bias.
“Smart move by Smith as Judge Cannon won’t be likely to grant the gag order, will show her patent bias, and Smith can then appeal to the 11th Circuit,” former FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday.
In an emailed statement to Newsweek on Friday, Trump campaign communications director Steven Cheung said the motion was evidence that “Crooked Joe Biden and his Hacks and Thugs are obsessed with trying to deprive President Trump and all American voters of their First Amendment rights.”
He added: “Repeated attempts to silence President Trump during the presidential campaign are blatant attempts to interfere in the election. They are last-ditch efforts of desperate Democrat Radicals running a losing campaign for a failed president.”
Update 5/26/24, 6:02 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional information.
