Six ‘winners’ of Louisiana articulate-budge hog attempting contest accused of cheating, face criminal charges
OEIS Cheating Spouse Private Investigator:
Louisiana plant life and fauna officials web arrested six males after they had been allegedly caught committing fraud when they obtained two articulate-budge attempting contests by handing over wild hogs caught in Texas.
Louisiana Division of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF) law enforcement agents arrested 30-year-old Impress Davis of Longville, 27-year-old Hunter Web, 35-year-old Davy Haymon, and 40-year-old Don Pollard Jr., all of Pitkin; 26-year-old Coby Bushnell of Dry Creek; and 34-year-old Nathan Granger of Vinton and charged them with attempting contest fraud and criminal conspiracy.
Davis, Webb, Bushnell, Haymon and Pollard Jr. face a further designate of violating interstate commerce, whereas Davis used to be moreover charged with obstruction of justice.
Additionally, Webb used to be charged with attempting below a attempting license suspension.
Six Louisiana males captured wild hogs in Texas earlier than turning them into contests of their very non-public articulate, in a roundabout intention worthwhile the pause prize.(Rodger Mallison/Citadel Price Star-Telegram/Tribune Records Service by intention of Getty Photos)
Primarily based on an announcement from the LDWF, investigators aloof proof revealing the six suspects caught hogs in Texas, which had been was in for the Dingler Wild Hog Roundup in Bienville Parish from Feb. 9-10, moreover for the Swamp Time Hog Hunt in Caldwell Parish from March 14-16.
Ideas for every contests stipulate the hogs ought to be caught in the end of the dates of the occasions, and inside Louisiana.
Granger did no longer steal part within the Caldwell attempting contest and reportedly was himself into the Bienville Parish Jail on June 4.
Louisiana law enforcement officials arrested six males for allegedly capturing wild hogs in Texas and turning them in to articulate-budge contests.(iStock)
The leisure of the hunters was themselves into the Bienville Parish and Caldwell Parish jails on June 7.
Fox Records Digital reached out to LDWF officials but did no longer all of a sudden hear abet.
LDWF officials said the maximum penalty for attempting contest fraud and criminal conspiracy is a year in detention heart and a $3,000 elegant.
Suspects charged with violating interstate commerce withstand a $950 elegant and 120 days in detention heart, whereas those charged with obstruction of justice might presumably per chance also very effectively be fined $10,000 and face 5 years in detention heart.
Examine the forefront of digital research in our Latest News & Blog. Study expert analyses, technological advancements, and key industry insights that keep you informed and prepared in the ever-evolving world of digital forensics.
OEIS cyber security Investigator: GCHQ director Anne Keast-Butler uses her first major public speech to warn that China poses a significant cyber security threat to the UK
China poses a genuine and increasing cyber risk to the UK, the director of Britain’s electronic intelligence gathering agency said today.
Anne Keast-Butler used her first major public speech as director of GCHQ to call out China’s development of hostile hacking capabilities.
The warning reflects concerns by western intelligence agencies that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is increasingly working with non-state cyber organisations to boost its hacking capabilities.
She warned that China’s “coercive and destabilising” actions posed a significant threat to the UK and other western countries. “In cyber space, we believe that the PRC’s irresponsible actions weaken the security of the internet for all,” said Keast-Butler. “China has built an advanced set of cyber capabilities, and is taking advantage of a growing commercial ecosystem of hacking outfits and data brokers at its disposal.”
The government has called out Chinese hackers for threatening the security of the UK in recent months.
These include a campaign by a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group that targeted the email accounts of over 40 UK parliamentarians that had spoken out against China.
Chinese state-sponsored hackers were also responsible for compromising the Electoral Commission between 2021 and 2022.
The Chinese government is stockpiling security vulnerabilities to use in future hacking attacks, according to cyber security officials.
Under Chinese law, Chinese companies and cyber security organisations are required to report newly discovered security vulnerabilities to the Chinese government.
A Chinese hacking competition due to take place in June 2024, for example, is offering $2.5m in prize money for exploits and vulnerabilities in software, operating systems, and network and security equipment.
Western intelligence agencies are concerned that Chinese state-sponsored hacking groups are gaining access to the computer networks of energy, electricity and other critical services providers to use as potential political leverage.
They warn that the groups are installing hacking capabilities that could be used at a later date to threaten to disrupt critical infrastructure of western countries.
Harry Coker, national security director at the White House, said in a speech today that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army has invested “tremendous” resources in a cyber programme “to hold critical civilian infrastructure at risk”.
“In a crisis or conflict scenario, China could use their pre-positioned cyber capabilities to wreak havoc in civilian infrastructure and deter US military action,” he said. “Make no mistake, this is a global challenge. China’s ambitions to use its cyber power coercively extends far beyond the United States.”
OEIS cyber security Investigator: Greatest risk
Felicity Oswald, CEO of the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), the UK’s technical authority on cyber security, added that alongside China, Russia and North Korea continue to pose the greatest risk to the UK and its allies.
“China poses a systemic challenge to our values and interests, a challenge that grows more acute as the country moves towards even greater authoritarianism,” she said, speaking at the NCSC’s Cyber UK conference.
She singled out the Chinese Volt Typhoon hacking group, which she said could be laying the groundwork for disruptive or destructive cyber attacks.
Volt Typhoon has targeted multiple CNI operators in the US Pacific island territory of Guam, close to Taiwan, and also across the US.
They include communications services providers, manufacturers, utilities, transport operators, construction firms, IT companies, educational institutions and government bodies.
There has been no indication that Volt Typhoon has targeted organisations in the UK, but Oswald said the group served as a clear warning about China’s intent to hold essential networks at risk. “And it is a warning that providers of essential services in the UK cannot afford to ignore,” she added.
What qualifies as a subject cybersecurity incident? Will we estimate our seemingly losses and the outcomes of commercial disruption? What had been our recovery costs? What longer-term remediation costs perform now we must consist of in our 8-K incident portray? How did our actions following the breach replicate the response readiness functionality previously detailed in our most up-to-date Blueprint 10-K disclosure?
The SEC’s cyber disclosure rules: classes realized so a ways in year one
getty
These and other questions illustrate why complying with the U.S. Securities and Change Commission’s (SEC/Commission) amended Cybersecurity Disclosure Rule—which became once formally adopted 365 days ago and efficient for this previous year’s annual stories and for cyber incidents going down after December 18, 2023—requires deep and nuanced recordsdata of cybersecurity, incident response, recordsdata governance, monetary reporting, investor relations, regulatory compliance and risk management. This mixture of expertise makes it crucial for CFOs and chief recordsdata security officers (CISOs) to collaborate carefully, in phase through two-ability education. CFOs can savor to quiet school CISOs on materiality evaluations and reporting to the board, while CISOs can relieve finance chiefs better perceive recovery costs, remediation efforts, single versus mixture breaches, and the nature of compromised recordsdata.
Partnering carefully with their CISO is surely one of a variety of actions CFOs can savor to quiet take into accout to toughen their cybersecurity disclosures, preparedness and incident evaluate process.
Oeisdigitalinvestigator.com: What We’ve Learned So A ways
Adopted closing July and efficient in mid-December, the SEC’s up so a ways cybersecurity disclosure rule requires Blueprint 10-K filings to characterize 1) processes for identifying, assessing and managing subject matter cybersecurity dangers and threats, and a pair of) the board of directors’ oversight role in assessing and managing cybersecurity dangers. The rule of thumb moreover requires SEC registrants to subject an 8-K cybersecurity incident portray when a breach (either a single assault or a chain of incidents) is deemed to savor a subject affect to the commercial. An incident portray can savor to quiet be filed inner four commercial days of the corporate’s materiality resolution.
The nature of these requirements commands the CFO’s state involvement and oversight, besides to the CISO’s expertise and engagement. Every executives needs to make certain about the threshold at which a cyberattack rises to the stage of a subject incident—and making this resolution might well require extra frequent dialogue and collaboration. This form they wish to agree on the materiality resolution process. What perform the rules require, how perform we practice them, what recordsdata perform we need, who needs to be alive to, who decides, and the procedure perform we guarantee the resolution is reached inner an inexpensive time length are questions finest answered in the chilly of the day slightly than in the heat of the moment.
It moreover formulation that these two executives must perceive their deepest accountability for contributing to moral disclosures. That is also one thing unusual for the CISO and an procedure in which the CFO can present steering. In the aftermath of the SEC’s SolarWinds allegations, CISOs and other executives must presume that the Commission is preserving them as responsible for the accuracy of public filings because it does CFOs and CEOs.
So, what precisely is the SEC making an are attempting to search out in these filings? We’ve taken a end watch at fresh cybersecurity disclosures. Our prognosis of these disclosures, and the SEC responses thereto, implies that:
Firms are usually taking a conservative ability.
In reporting cybersecurity incidents, we’re noting an obvious willingness of some registrants to sigh incidents even when materiality has no longer yet been fully established—apparently erring on the side of warning slightly than risk no longer disclosing when, later in hindsight, they’ll savor to quiet savor. With admire to these voluntary disclosures, the SEC workers lately inspired registrants to sigh such incidents underneath a definite item of Blueprint 8-K, akin to Item 8.01 (Diversified Occasions), to defend a ways from diluting the price of Item 1.05 disclosures (Arena matter Cybersecurity Incidents) and potentially rising investor confusion. Unnecessary to utter, a 2nd Blueprint 8-K would be required if the registrant subsequently distinct that the incident is subject matter, in which case the disclosure would drop underneath Item 1.05. In such instances, the registrant might well take a look at with the sooner Blueprint 10-K filed underneath Item 8.01.
The stage of element in 8-K incident stories varies.
Some companies present intensive recordsdata about the nature of attacks and their containment recommendations. Others decide for a excessive-stage ability, reporting recordsdata that will maybe well practice to almost any cybersecurity incident. Some companies usually described taking instructed actions—akin to keeping apart affected programs and conducting forensic investigations—once an incident became once detected. Most companies reported that that they had notified relevant legislation enforcement companies and had been working carefully with them as required. Many disclosures referenced particular conversation protocols for inner reporting and external conversation with stakeholders.
The Commission doesn’t savor ambiguity.
The SEC took one filer to activity for vague language regarding materiality in an 8-K incident portray that ran afoul of its disclosure requirements. We’ve moreover viewed filers distinguish between monetary materiality and operational materiality of their 8-Ks, whatever the truth that the rule specializes in a single theory of materiality of which the SEC’s definition remains consistent. Reviews many times cited activation of commercial continuity plans to lower carrier disruptions; however, crucial points regarding the effectiveness of these plans or the time frames for paunchy recovery had been frequently disregarded.
Most SEC registrants agree that identifying a functional chief for cybersecurity matters and providing periodic cybersecurity-connected reporting to the board are most simple practices. Of camouflage, even although most companies cite their readiness to respond to cyber incidents, about one-quarter of the ten-K filings we reviewed perform no longer explicitly characterize preparedness recommendations. Whereas virtually all companies referenced efforts to mitigate cybersecurity dangers through established processes, procedures and programs, a smaller yet significant majority disclosed alignment with external frameworks—which implies there’s room for enchancment in adopting known finest practices. Interestingly, a well-known half of organizations reported the exhaust of external just cybersecurity advisers, indicating that such third-birthday celebration expertise is functional or most simple.
Oeisdigitalinvestigator.com: Sharpen Disclosures
CFOs can fabricate better cybersecurity disclosures and relieve guarantee their filings fulfill SEC requirements by taking the following actions:
These two executives needs to be joined on the hip to navigate the cyber disclosure rules minefield efficiently. When ending an 8-K incident portray, many CFOs will need CISOs to relieve them perceive the nature of the assault, the variety of recordsdata (for my allotment identifiable recordsdata, precious mental property, and masses others.) that became once compromised, and the scope and effort of the recovery effort. CISOs will moreover need finance leaders to educate them about incident identification, response protocols and other aspects of cyber risk mitigation that SEC registrants must element of their 10-K filings. To boot to teaching CISOs on materiality determinations and the procedure cybersecurity incidents affect investor relations, CFOs can savor to quiet take into accout arranging for CISOs to participate in conferences of the board committee that oversees cybersecurity disclosures (usually a disclosure, audit or expertise committee).
Compose a materiality framework for cybersecurity incidents.
Thus a ways, many organizations savor relied on unusual approaches and solutions for determining materiality—many times with refined, cyber-connected adjustments—to evaluate whether or no longer a cyber incident deserves disclosure. Whereas this means has handed muster so a ways, extra immense adjustments seemingly are wished. An efficient cyber incident materiality framework can savor to quiet tackle a combination of monetary, operational and technical concerns. It might well in reality probably perchance quiet moreover comprise moral estimates of recovery and remediation costs (both immediate and prolonged-term) besides to context: A $20 million ransomware tournament has diversified impacts on a $100 million company versus a $10 billion enterprise. Whether an assault is a single incident or a chain of connected, or aggregated, breaches over time moreover warrants consideration.
Benchmark public filings.
The SEC did no longer present a template for the unusual cybersecurity disclosure requirements, and we’ve viewed some cyber disclosure approaches already drop out of favor (e.g., differentiating between monetary materiality and operational materiality). As companies proceed to conform, their 10-K and 8-K disclosures will naturally evolve to better replicate the intent of the rule. As such, finance and recordsdata security leaders can savor to quiet observe how other companies craft their disclosures. To boot to learning annual stories, CFOs and CISOs can video show 8-K stories on incident trackers. Final analysis, here’s a learning process, and it behooves the CFO and CISO to realise what’s working and what’s no longer.
Bolster cybersecurity risk management.
As the regulatory spotlight on cybersecurity capabilities intensifies, CFOs can savor to quiet take into accout ways they’ll lead and make contributions to efforts to present a enhance to cybersecurity risk management and governance practices and incident identification, response and reporting processes. This effort moreover can savor to quiet focal point on extra particular determinations of incident materiality, among other aspects of the SEC’s cybersecurity disclosure rule.
Oeisdigitalinvestigator.com: Closing solutions
Some boards are adding directors with cybersecurity expertise (fancy the “monetary reporting expert” on the audit committee), however the post-SEC cyber disclosure-rule trend has yet to be distinct. A Heidrick & Struggles portray effectively-known that finest 14% of most up-to-date board appointments in 2022 had cybersecurity expertise, a decline from 17% the outdated year. With out a recordsdata offered for 2023, the appointments throughout 2024 shall be of hobby when printed subsequent year.
As with previous requirements from the Commission for ticket spanking unusual disclosures, we demand the SEC workers to was less tolerant of vague language, generic boilerplate discussions and other disclosure practices that inch counter to the letter and spirit of its rules. This makes it crucial for the CFO to fabricate a solid partnership with the CISO and put certain pointers and processes for defining, identifying, responding to and reporting subject matter cyber incidents in 8-K and 10-K filings.
“My behavior on that video is inexcusable,” he said. “I take full responsibility for my actions in that video. I’m disgusted.”
After the 2016 assault, Combs, who was at “rock bottom,” claimed he “sought out professional help, started going to therapy and rehab [and] had to ask god for his mercy and grace.”
On Sunday, Sean “Diddy” Combs addressed the video showing him assaulting Cassie Ventura in 2016 — but not everyone is buying his apology. Diddy/Instagram
Two of his most outspoken critics, 50 Cent and Aubrey O’Day, both posted about the questionably timed apology. Diddy/Instagram
After the video went live, Aubrey O’Day — one of Diddy’s longtime critics — slammed the music mogul for not apologizing to Ventura.
“Diddy did not apologize to Cassie,” the former Danity Kane member wrote on X. “He apologized to the world for seeing what he did.”
O’Day slammed the music mogul for not specifically mentioning Ventura in his video. aubreyoday/Instagram
She claimed he only apologized because he was caught. FilmMagic
She then called out Combs for keeping up a December 2023 post in which he claimed everyone accusing him of abuse and was looking for “a quick payday” and trying to “assassinate [his] character and destroy [his] reputation.”
O’Day continued, “He says he’s ‘disgusted w himself now, and he was disgusted w himself then’.. but apparently he wasn’t disgusted enough w himself to not PIN this statement out calling her a liar & denying all of it.. leave god and mercy out of this, they aren’t present here, and you know it.”
“The lie detector test has determined this was a lie…. Maury vibes,” the 48-year-old said of the poorly aged post.
The “In Da Club” rapper called it a “bad move.” Getty Images
Both 50 Cent and O’Day also slammed Diddy for keeping up a post denying the allegations of abuse against him. WireImage
Although the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office will not be pressing charges against Combs due to the statute of limitations, the “Candy Shop” rapper believes the court of public opinion will hold him accountable.
“This is why they put that tape out, they know they can’t charge him with what we saw, but they know we can’t un see what we saw,” he added.
While Cassie has yet to directly address the disturbing footage — which she detailed in her lawsuit — or Comb’s apology, her lawyers also slammed the music mogul on Sunday.
Want more celebrity and pop culture news?
Start your day with Page Six Daily.
Thanks for signing up!
Ventura sued Diddy, whom she dated on and off for a decade, in November 2023. Jeff Vespa
In the lawsuit, she accused him of rape and abuse, amongst other things. They settled one day later. CNN
“Combs’ most recent statement is more about himself than the many people he has hurt,” Meredith Firetog, a partner at Wigdor LLP, the legal firm representing Ventura, told Page Six in a statement.
“When Cassie and multiple other women came forward, he denied everything and suggested that his victims were looking for a payday.”
She continued, “That he was only compelled to ‘apologize’ once his repeated denials were proven false shows his pathetic desperation, and no one will be swayed by his disingenuous words.”
