‘16 and Pregnant’ alum Autumn Crittendon wearisome at 27, incident underneath investigation
Private investigator near me:
“16 & Pregnant” alum Autumn Crittendon, who seemed on Season 5 of the MTV sequence, has died.
She used to be 27 and leaves slack three younger kids.
A earn from the Henrico County Police Division in Virginia suggested Online page Six in an announcement Monday that she died at house after being discovered “unresponsive” on Saturday afternoon.
We’re suggested paramedics “tried life-saving measures” nonetheless that “they had been no longer effective.”
Crittendon, whose ethical final name used to be Oxley, “used to be pronounced wearisome on the scene,” we’re suggested.
We’re suggested the police division is “currently classifying this incident as a loss of life investigation” and that “detectives are working with the Squawk of enterprise of the Chief Scientific Examiner on this case to resolve the right role off and system of loss of life.”
TMZ reported that Oxley’s stepfather used to be the one who discovered her unresponsive in her bed room on the house she lived in with him, her mom and her younger people.
Need more celeb and pop culture news?
Birth your day with Online page Six Day-to-day.
Thanks for signing up!
Sources suggested the outlet that the actuality celebrity had been in unhappy health and complaining of heartburn. She additionally reportedly had diabetes and kidney factors.
Per the outlet, her family is working with law enforcement on the investigation.
Within the period in-between, Oxley’s sister Misty Crittendon broke the news of her passing in a since-deleted Fb post Sunday, in accordance to Starcasm.
“You had been robbed of your life at this sort of younger age, you left sooner than any person would possibly perhaps well advise you goodbye.. how valuable we cherish you.. how amazing you are and how proud we’re of you for staying sober via about a of the toughest parts of your life, how some distance you’ve got right here from where you had been, how thankful we’re to obtain had all these years with you, how sufficient with you we’re as a mom, how grateful we’re for the 3 microscopic parts of your heart which will likely be soundless strolling this earth,” Crittendon wrote in part.
She went on to affirm, “Half of me died with you the earlier day and I truthfully don’t know the device I’m ever gonna in actual fact get better from this. … Pulling up seeing your total vehicles, an empty ambulance.. and jumping out of the truck as rapidly as I would possibly perhaps well begging the paramedics and police officers to advise me you had been okay and they had been ethical working to support you alive in there.. Nevertheless my worst dread used to be confirmed and I collapsed within the dual carriageway.”
Per Starcasm, Crittendon shared a 2d since-deleted post in which she known as out a person that used to be allegedly linked to Oxley.
The outlet reported that the unnamed man’s Fb internet page indicated that he married Oxley in October 2020; alternatively, he’s reportedly “single,” as used to be she sooner than her loss of life.
“YOU robbed my babies of their mom. YOU robbed my mom of her diminutive one. YOU introduced on a mom and father to bury their youngest child. YOU robbed my child of his a number of mom. YOU robbed me of my handiest f–king buddy,” Crittendon reportedly wrote.
Online page Six can disclose that she changed her profile image unhurried Sunday evening and included the hashtags #JusticeforAutumn and #CrittendonStrong.
Oxley welcomed son Drake, 10, along with his father, Dustin Franklin, in December 2013. She went on to obtain but any other boy and a woman, who’re practically 5 and practically 2, respectively.
Examine the forefront of digital research in our Latest News & Blog. Study expert analyses, technological advancements, and key industry insights that keep you informed and prepared in the ever-evolving world of digital forensics.
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas could soon offer up to $5 million in grants for schools to outfit surveillance cameras with artificial intelligence systems that can spot people carrying guns. But the governor needs to approve the expenditures and the schools must meet some very specific criteria.
The AI software must be patented, “designated as qualified anti-terrorism technology,” in compliance with certain security industry standards, already in use in at least 30 states and capable of detecting “three broad firearm classifications with a minimum of 300 subclassifications” and “at least 2,000 permutations,” among other things.
Only one company currently meets all those criteria: the same organization that touted them to Kansas lawmakers crafting the state budget. That company, ZeroEyes, is a rapidly growing firm founded by military veterans after the fatal shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida.
The legislation pending before Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly highlights two things. After numerous high-profile shootings, school security has become a multibillion-dollar industry. And in state capitols, some companies are successfully persuading policymakers to write their particular corporate solutions into state law.
ZeroEyes also appears to be the only firm qualified for state firearms detection programs under laws enacted last year in Michigan and Utah, bills passed earlier this year in Florida and Iowa and legislation proposed in Colorado, Louisiana and Wisconsin.
On Friday, Missouri became the latest state to pass legislation geared toward ZeroEyes, offering $2.5 million in matching grants for schools to buy firearms detection software designated as “qualified anti-terrorism technology.”
“We’re not paying legislators to write us into their bills,” ZeroEyes co-founder and Chief Revenue Officer Sam Alaimo said. But “if they’re doing that, it means I think they’re doing their homework, and they’re making sure they’re getting a vetted technology.”
ZeroEyes uses artificial intelligence with surveillance cameras to identify visible guns, then flashes an alert to an operations center staffed around the clock by former law enforcement officers and military veterans. If verified as a legitimate threat by ZeroEyes personnel, an alert is sent to school officials and local authorities.
The goal is to “get that gun before that trigger’s squeezed, or before that gun gets to the door,” Alaimo said.
Few question the technology. But some do question the legislative tactics.
The super-specific Kansas bill — particularly the requirement that a company have its product in at least 30 states — is “probably the most egregious thing that I have ever read” in legislation, said Jason Stoddard, director of school safety and security for Charles County Public Schools in Maryland.
Stoddard is chairperson of the newly launched National Council of School Safety Directors, which formed to set standards for school safety officials and push back against vendors who are increasingly pitching particular products to lawmakers.
When states allot millions of dollars for certain products, it often leaves less money for other important school safety efforts, such as electronic door locks, shatter-resistant windows, communication systems and security staff, he said.
“The artificial-intelligence-driven weapons detection is absolutely wonderful,” Stoddard said. “But it’s probably not the priority that 95% of the schools in the United States need right now.”
The technology also can be costly, which is why some states are establishing grant programs. In Florida, legislation to implement ZeroEyes technology in schools in just two counties cost a total of about $929,000.
ZeroEyes is not the only company using surveillance systems with artificial intelligence to spot guns. One competitor, Omnilert, pivoted from emergency alert systems to firearms detection several years ago and also offers around-the-clock monitoring centers to quickly review AI-detected guns and pass alerts onto local officials.
But Omnilert does not yet have a patent for its technology. And it has not yet been designated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as an anti-terrorism technology under a 2002 federal law providing liability protections for companies. It has applied for both.
Though Omnilert is in hundreds of schools, its products aren’t in 30 states, said Mark Franken, Omnilert’s vice president of marketing. But he said that shouldn’t disqualify his company from state grants.
Franken has contacted the Kansas governor’s office in hopes she will line-item veto the specific criteria, which he said “create a kind of anti-competitive environment.”
In Iowa, legislation requiring schools to install firearms detection software was amended to give companies providing the technology until July 1, 2025, to receive federal designation as an anti-terrorism technology. But Democratic state Rep. Ross Wilburn said that designation was originally intended as an incentive for companies to develop technology.
“It was not put in place to provide, promote any type of advantage to one particular company or another,” Wilburn said during House debate.
In Kansas, ZeroEyes’ chief strategy officer presented an overview of its technology in February to the House K-12 Education Budget Committee. It included a live demonstration of its AI gun detection and numerous actual surveillance photos spotting guns at schools, parking lots and transit stations. The presentation also noted authorities arrested about a dozen people last year directly as a result of ZeroEyes alerts.
Kansas state Rep. Adam Thomas, a Republican, initially proposed to specifically name ZeroEyes in the funding legislation. The final version removed the company’s name but kept the criteria that essentially limits it to ZeroEyes.
House K-12 Budget Committee Chair Kristey Williams, a Republican, vigorously defended that provision. She argued during a negotiating meeting with senators that because of student safety, the state couldn’t afford the delays of a standard bidding process. She also touted the company’s technology as unique.
”We do not feel that there was another alternative,” Williams said last month.
The $5 million appropriation won’t cover every school, but Thomas said the amount could later increase once people see how well ZeroEyes technology works.
“I’m hopeful that it does exactly what we saw it do and prevents gun violence in the schools,” Thomas told The Associated Press, “and we can eventually get it in every school.”
OEIS Surveillance Investigator: ___
Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Missouri. Associated Press writer Hannah Fingerhut contributed from Des Moines, Iowa.
DEAR ABBY: My partner and I are both in our mid-50s. As a result of a scientific subject she has, we now not steadily ever have intercourse. I don’t no doubt judge about it very typically anymore. Meanwhile, I have a friend, “Edie.” Now we have been friends for a shining few years now. I met her in my aspect job as a handyman. She’s in her 80s.
My partner has met Edie and calls her my “girlfriend” in a joking formulation, a minimal of I judge so. In most cases, Edie would fall diminutive sexual remarks, which, within the origin, I never noticed. After I known them, I never no doubt conception mighty about them.
One day neutral currently, Edie turned into as soon as having a unfriendly day and turned into as soon as crying about attempting to no doubt feel alive. One thing resulted in one other, and we harm up having intercourse. Now she has “awoke” and continuously wants to have interplay in intercourse when I look her. Till now, I never cheated on my partner for your total years we now have been married, and it weighs on my mind carefully.
I love my partner and don’t have to lose her or the relationship we now have. I additionally don’t have to demolish the relationship I have with Edie, if that’s that it is seemingly you’ll maybe well maybe mediate, who’s upright a shining friend and nothing extra. Edie’s well being is starting up to derive moderately of touchy and, per her family history, she’s going to are living finest a couple of extra years. She doesn’t no doubt have many friends or family to employ time alongside with her.
Can I reduction my partner and my friendship with Edie? Please give me some neutral exact-looking advice as I fight with what to attain. –– GOOD HUSBAND AND FRIEND
DEAR HUSBAND/FRIEND: Rep up! I have news for you. Since you started servicing Edie, she has change into one thing rather than a “neutral exact-looking friend,” and also you have change into in a sense her boy toy.
At the same time as you fancy your partner, cease the burgeoning affair now earlier than it blows out of reduction watch over and your partner finds out. At the same time as you leave this to continue, your partner could be anguish, and possibilities are neutral exact-looking that your marriage could be destroyed.
DEAR ABBY: My 28-one year-outmoded son turned into as soon as killed by a semi in a success-and-speed. We didn’t accumulate out for weeks until he turned into as soon as known by fingerprints. My husband and I have been devoted contributors of a church congregation. Many cases, I turned into as soon as responsible of the nursery. For three months earlier than the accident, I had been conserving a teen for a church member for free of payment because her dad turned into as soon as in downhearted health with most cancers.
When my son turned into as soon as killed, Abby, now not one particular person sent a casserole and even called me. Obviously, I didn’t slip to church for a couple weeks. But no one, at the side of the preacher, reached out! Since then, I no longer reduction that categorical congregation. Am I looking ahead to too mighty? — SO HURT IN THE SOUTH
DEAR SO HURT: Please get my sympathy for the tragic loss of your son. As an brisk member of that congregation, you expected extra of a response than standard silence. Greater than one particular person dropped the ball after your tragedy, and below the circumstances, your anguish is pure. You doubtlessly did the finest thing by changing churches, and I’m hoping you are receiving emotional enhance from the new congregation you have joined.
Pricey Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, typically is named Jeanne Phillips, and turned into as soon as founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. Contact Pricey Abby at http://www.DearAbby.com or P.O. Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069.
Firms under police investigation over the construction of Grenfell Tower are unlikely to find out if they face charges before the end of 2026, according to official prosecutors.
The Metropolitan Police expects to receive the Grenfell Inquiry’s phase two report later this year.
It will then need “at least between 12 and 18 months” to complete its investigation and hand it over to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), it said today.
At a press briefing held today, the head of CPS’s special crimes unit, Rosemary Ainslie, said it was “not possible” to provide a definitive timescale on the process.
But she added: “It would be our hope that by the end of 2026 we will be in a position where we are making final charges.”
Met deputy assistant commissioner Stuart Cundy declined to speculate on how long it would take before trials would then take place, but said that in “typical major crime cases” it could be at least six months before trials begin.
“The more complex the cases, both in terms of scale and complexity, the longer that time could be,” he added. “And of course, the more defendants there might be in a case adds another level of complexity.”
In total, the Met has put together 20 early investigative advice files in the case, and has submitted eight of those to the CPS already.
The force’s probe into the 2017 fire, which killed 72 people, is investigating 19 separate companies and organisations plus 58 individuals for offences including corporate manslaughter, misconduct in a public office and gross negligence manslaughter.
One of the individuals was previously arrested and then released in October 2020, Cundy said.
Some individuals are also being investigated for fraud and perverting the course of justice, he said.
Cundy declined to give more details on the individuals or companies that are currently under investigation, citing efforts to protect the investigation itself.
“The police have one chance to get this investigation done to the right standard, the right quality and done the right way,” he said.
“We owe that to those who lost their lives and to everybody who has been affected by the tragedy.”
So far, the police has already carried out more than 300 hours worth of interviews, and has spent £107.3m carrying out its inquiry.
The police service said that 180 staff members were working on the investigation full time, and that there has been “no loss in momentum” since it launched its investigation into the fire.
The investigation has already generated 27,000 lines of inquiry and more than 12,000 witness statements. Members of the police force also spent 415 days forensically examining Grenfell Tower itself.
The Met said it was working on the investigation with experts in topics like building safety, based both in the UK and abroad.
Today’s update came after it emerged last month that the final report into the Grenfell Tower fire had been delayed for a third time.
The report had been due for release last autumn but the date was shifted to early this year, before the latest postponement.
In its last progress update in November, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry team said it aimed to publish its phase two report before the seventh anniversary of the fire on 14 June.
This date has been now pushed further into the summer.